• Home
  • Services
  • IP Value Blog
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact

VLF Consulting, Inc.

  • Judge Posner (IL) Requests a Preliminary Damages Assessment

    April 30, 2012
    • Tweet

    In an order after a preliminary conference, Judge Posner expresses his concern that damages will be nontrivial, and gives the parties two weeks to submit briefs addressing the issue.  This is a sensible question in many cases, and we at VLF Consulting are in fact seeing increasing interest by our clients in early stage damages assessments.  As ever, contact us for assistance.

    Here, Judge Posner states: “I am concerned whether the plaintiffs if successful in establishing liability will be entitled to nontrivial damages awards. Suppose the defendants infringed the asserted patents … On those assumptions, would the plaintiffs have any claim for damages, whether compensatory or punitive, or restitution? I would like the parties to address this question in briefs filed simultaneously by close of business on April 2.”

    Brandeis University et al v. Nestle USA, Inc., 1-12-cv-01513 (N.D. IL, March 16, 2012, Order) (Posner)

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.
  • SEARCH

    What we do

    IP Value Blog focuses on news and current court cases regarding intellectual property valuation. IP Value Blog is published by Eric Phillips of VLF Consulting.

    Subscribe via Email

    TAGS

    25% Rule, Apportionment Techniques, Data Considered, Date of Hypothetical Negotiation, Daubert, Entire Market Value Rule, Forward Citation Analysis, Hypothetical Negotiation, Jury Verdict Form, License Agreement Comparability, Lost Profits, Lump Sum, Method Claims, Nash Equilibrium, Non-Infringing Alternatives, Patent Reform Act, Post-Judgment Royalty, Prejudgment Interest, Royalty Base, Royalty Rate, Surveys, Use of Settlement Agreements
  • LinkedIn
© VLF Consulting, Inc. 2025
  • Privacy Policy