• Home
  • Services
  • IP Value Blog
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact

VLF Consulting, Inc.

  • District Court: Lost Profits For a Could-Have-Been Supply Chain are Not Appropriate

    August 23, 2011 Lost Profits
    • Tweet

    In this California district court pretrial order, Judge Whyte excluded plaintiff Synthes lost profits claim.  Here, the accused Spinal Kinetics products were primarily sold in Germany, and the judge clearly agrees that but for theinfringement, those sales would have gone to a Synthes product.  The problem is that the sales would have been made by Synthes’ European distribution chain, which is not a party to the litigation.   The court describes how, despite this situation, Synthes constructs a “fictional supply chain wherein [the relevant] ProDisc products destined for Europe could have been manufactured in the United States then artificially funneled through Synthes USA, LLC for no other reason than to make its lost profits claim.”  As a result, Synthes USA may only recover reasonable royalty damages.

    Case: Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc., 5-09-cv-01201 (ND CA, August 19, 2011, Order) (Whyte)

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.
  • SEARCH

    What we do

    IP Value Blog focuses on news and current court cases regarding intellectual property valuation. IP Value Blog is published by Eric Phillips of VLF Consulting.

    Subscribe via Email

    TAGS

    25% Rule, Apportionment Techniques, Data Considered, Date of Hypothetical Negotiation, Daubert, Entire Market Value Rule, Forward Citation Analysis, Hypothetical Negotiation, Jury Verdict Form, License Agreement Comparability, Lost Profits, Lump Sum, Method Claims, Nash Equilibrium, Non-Infringing Alternatives, Patent Reform Act, Post-Judgment Royalty, Prejudgment Interest, Royalty Base, Royalty Rate, Surveys, Use of Settlement Agreements
  • LinkedIn
© VLF Consulting, Inc. 2025
  • Privacy Policy