• Home
  • Services
  • IP Value Blog
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact

VLF Consulting, Inc.

  • Ouch. Checkpoint Told to Pay Defendants’ Attorneys’ Fees of $6.6 Million

    November 9, 2011
    • Tweet

    This week’s reminder of the often high costs of patent litigation comes to us from a Pennsylvania court, which ordered plaintiff Checkpoint Systems to pay for the attorney fees and costs for defendants All-Tag and Sensormatic, totaling $6.6 million.  The court awarded the fees after it found the case to be exceptional, primarily because Checkpoint’s infringement expert never looked at the actual accused products in relation to the patent-in-suit (instead, it reviewed products made in a different country and also defendant’s patents).

    And as a reminder of how slowly the wheels of justice sometimes turn, this trial (and the jury finding in favor of defendants) occurred 4.5 years ago – in February 2007.

    Checkpoint Systems v. All-Tag Security, et. al., 2-01-cv-02223 (E.D. PA, November 2, 2011, Order)(Tucker)

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.
  • SEARCH

    What we do

    IP Value Blog focuses on news and current court cases regarding intellectual property valuation. IP Value Blog is published by Eric Phillips of VLF Consulting.

    Subscribe via Email

    TAGS

    25% Rule, Apportionment Techniques, Data Considered, Date of Hypothetical Negotiation, Daubert, Entire Market Value Rule, Forward Citation Analysis, Hypothetical Negotiation, Jury Verdict Form, License Agreement Comparability, Lost Profits, Lump Sum, Method Claims, Nash Equilibrium, Non-Infringing Alternatives, Patent Reform Act, Post-Judgment Royalty, Prejudgment Interest, Royalty Base, Royalty Rate, Surveys, Use of Settlement Agreements
  • LinkedIn
© VLF Consulting, Inc. 2025
  • Privacy Policy